Good Text Book on Public Policy

Section I:  What Is Public Policy?

Chapter 1:  Public Decision Making
Chapter 2:  Why Is It So Hard to Make the World a Better Place?


Section II:  Why We Do What We Do

Chapter 3:  Understanding Individual Behavior:  Rational Man and Woman
Chapter 4:  Understanding Group Behavior:  Collective Action        
Chapter 5:  Evaluating Social Welfare


Section III:  Markets and Government

Chapter 6:  The Political Process
Chapter 7:  The Market System
Chapter 8:  The Role of Government


Section IV: Tools for Analysis

Chapter 9:  Gathering and Measuring Information
Chapter 10:  Basic Data Analysis
Chapter 11:  Introduction to Regression Analysis
Chapter 12:  Benefit-Cost Analysis
Chapter 13:  Program Evaluation


Section V:  Making Policy

Chapter 14:  The Role of Institutions
Chapter 15:  Policy Design

Introduction to Public Policy by Charles Wheelan

A mathematician on Capital Budgeting

Priority-setting and capital budgeting. Allocating a budget often involves the comparisons of diverse projects whose benefits are difficult to directly estimate and then compare. Organizations also often confuse budget items defined by accounting conditions with actionable projects. A good budgeting process is built by creating useful "decision units," robust measurement criteria and a group process for obtaining inputs and finally ranking projects. Such budgeting processes are equally useful in private corporations and governmental organizations. I have developed such ranking processes for Los Alamos National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory, ChevronTexaco. Included in the projects are rankings to allocate yearly budgets for contaminated site cleanups, repair priorities for oil pipelines and capital project rankings for electric utilities.

From John Kadvany

Risk: A Very Short Introduction

Table of Contents
1. Risk decisions
2. Defining risks
3. Analyzing risks
4. Risk perceptions
5. Risk communication
6. Reconciling risks
7. Risk, culture and society

Authors: Baruch Fischhoff and John Kadvany

Assorted

How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement


The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America


Andrew Leigh's blog

Tony Blair on Deliverology

Blair talks about the Delivery Unit as one of his successes in his memoir and gives credit to Sir Machael Barber.

'It was relatively a small organizatiion, staffed by civil servants but also outsiders from McKinsey, Bain and other private sector companies, whose job was to track the delivery of key government priorities. It would focus like a laser on an issue, draw up a plan to resolve it working with the department concerned, and then performance-manage it to a solution. It would get first-class data which it would use for stocktakes that I took personally with the minister, his key staff and mine, every month or so. The unit would present a progress report and any necessary action would be authorised....

We also created the Strategy Unit, to look ahead at the way policy would devlop, the fresh challenges and new ideas to meet them. That also was higly successful. It allowed us to take a medium- and even long-term view of certain issues that were looming but not imminent. Whereas the Policy Unit handled the day-to-day and focused on managing the departments to produce the policies and their implementation that derived from the manifesto or the departmental plans, the Strategy Unit was trying to trying to construct the next policy platform...

In summary, extra money plus system change delivered results...'

Related:
Imported From Britain: Ideas to Improve Schools

“What have all the great school systems of the world got in common?” he said, ticking off four systems that he said deserved to be called great, in Finland, Singapore, South Korea and Alberta, Canada. “Four systems, three continents — what do they have in common?

“They all select their teachers from the top third of their college graduates, whereas the U.S. selects its teachers from the bottom third of graduates. This is one of the big challenges for the U.S. education system: What are you going to do over the next 15 to 20 years to recruit ever better people into teaching?”

Recent Reports - Indian Government

Report of the Technology Advisory Group for Unique Projects

Public Debt Management


Report of the Working Group on Foreign Investment in India

Outcome Budget

'Long-run fiscal policy is health policy'

Is it a justification for earmarking a tax;

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, co-chaired by former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles and former Republican Senate Whip Alan Simpson, faces two over-riding problems. First, it must find a new source of revenue for the federal government, a source that is relatively stable, produces substantial proceeds, and does not create large disincentives for employment, saving, and investment. Second, it must bring the rate of growth of health care spending closer to the rate of growth of the rest of the economy. The gap over the last 30 years, 2.8 percent per annum, is unsustainable. As Alice Rivlin, a member of the new commission, has said, “Long-run fiscal policy is health policy.”1 Control of health expenditures will require comprehensive change in the way the country finances and delivers health care. A value-added tax (VAT) dedicated to funding basic health care for all through enrollment in accountable care organizations would help solve the revenue and health spending problems at the same time. A VAT, by itself, has much to recommend it. Unlike a payroll tax, it does not discriminate against employment. Unlike the income tax, it taxes only consumption, not saving. The base (consumer expenditures) is more stable than payroll or income over the business cycle and is large enough to provide a substantial yield at a relatively modest rate. While it is not immune to evasion or avoidance, a VAT is not as vulnerable to these problems as the income tax.

Making Sense of Government Report Cards

Government agencies increasingly are putting out report cards on cars, schools, restaurants and other offerings to help consumers sort among them. But such grading systems can emphasize simplicity over precision, and decisions about the criteria they use have a significant impact on results. Plus, using letter grades risks lumping together very different performers. In Los Angeles County, 98% of restaurants got A's or B's last year for health safety....

Different agencies view the grades differently, and that view affects how they construct the grading curve. Florida education officials keep changing their formula for rating schools "to continue to raise the bar" so schools keep seeking progress, says Juan Copa, bureau chief for research and evaluation for the state Department of Education.

The health departments in Los Angeles County and New York view A grades as an incentive for restaurants that improve their practices so they can lure in more customers; therefore, there aren't plans to make it harder to ace the test.

Grading systems inevitably include some criteria while excluding others, and require that choices be made about how to weight those that are included.

-Report Cards for Consumers Don't Always Make the Grade

Assorted Public Policy programs

Public Policy at Duke

Public Policy at Rand

GMU, and Maryland

Price Index of Marijuana

Price of Weed- an interesting project- "We want to crowdsource the street value of marijuana from the most accurate source possible: you, the consumer. Help by anonymously submitting data on the latest transaction you've made."